33 Thomas Street: The Strange 29-Story Building New York skyscraper with no windows. What’s the point?

33 Thomas Street: The Odd 29-Storey Structure A building in New York without windows. What’s the purpose?

In the midst of Lower Manhattan, a weird 29-story tower with no windows rises lofty and enigmatic. Titanpointe is the code name for the location, which is 33 Thomas Street. This edifice has baffled New Yorkers for years.1.

Constructed in 1974, the structure was designed to resist nuclear explosions and was intended to house critical communications equipment. The architecture firm John Carl Warnecke & Associates viewed it as a communication center protected from nuclear threats.

This magnificent structure is still intact. A gray structure composed of granite and concrete, it soars 550 feet over New York City’s skyline. Because it lacks windows, this apartment building stays dark in contrast to the neighboring office and residential buildings. It casts a large shadow during the day and has an eerie presence at night. The soft hum produced by its square vents is frequently overpowered by the city’s cacophony.

33 Thomas Street, popularly referred to as the “Long Lines Building,” has long been regarded by New Yorkers as one of the most unusual and well-known buildings in the city. The true function of the enigmatic edifice, however, has mainly remained a mystery.

The Real Story at 33 Thomas Street
33 Thomas Street’s enigmatic façade conceals a darker mystery. This building appears to be more than just a venue for conversation. Based on information from architectural drawings, interviews with former AT&T employees, and papers obtained by Edward Snowden, there is proof that 33 Thomas Street was utilized as an NSA surveillance outpost known as Titanpointe.

The involvement of the NSA is more than a wild speculation. A sizable international gateway switch located inside the structure allows calls to be made from the United States to any nation in the world. These calls are believed to have been monitored by the NSA from a safe location within the AT&T headquarters. This covert monitoring program has targeted numerous nations, including friends of the United States, as well as global organizations including the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the United Nations.

While AT&T and the NSA have collaborated on surveillance projects, little is known about the top-secret programs that are carried out out of locations like 33 Thomas Street. However, the Snowden documents provide previously unseen details regarding how NSA hardware has been linked to AT&T’s New York City network. The technology and methods used by the agency to extract communications data from the business’s systems are displayed in this integration.

Fani Willis Takes a Stand Against Nathan Wade – “The Only Thing A Woman Can Do For Him Is Make A Sandwich”

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis recently took to the stand where she spoke to the character of special prosecutor Nathan Wade. Willis’ relationship with Wade has come under increased scrutiny amid allegations of financiaI misconduct. Many have alleged the controversial relationship between Willis and Wade poses a massive conflict of interest.
According to Willis, her conversations with Wade were argumentative by nature, pertaining to the special prosecutor’s view of women. This district attorney claimed that Wade only sees value in women insofar as they will “make him a sandwich.” Willis explained how this dynamic was a source of tension in her relationship with Wade, noting how she gave “him his money back.”

“Mister, let’s go on and have the conversation,” Willis said. “Had absolutely nothing to do with this. It’s interesting that we’re here about this money. Mr. Wade is used to women that, as he told me one time, only thing a woman can do for him is make him a sandwich. We would have brutaI arguments about the fact that I am your equal. I don’t need anything from a man a man is not a plan. A man is a companion. And so there was tension always in our relationship, which is why I was give him his money back. I don’t need anybody to foot my bills, the only man who’s ever put my bills completely is my daddy.”
Following her monologue, Willis was asked, “Is there anything else you’d like to add to that?” She responded, “No. I’m sure we’ll talk about it further.” Willis’ comments about Wade have quickly made the rounds on social media.

Conservative Brief shared footage of Willis’ testimony on X, with the caption, “The Character Assassination Continues! On the stand, Fulton County DA Fani Willis continues to paint her lover Nathan Wade in a terrible light: “Mr. Wade is used to women that— as he told me one time— the only thing a woman can do for him is make a sandwich.””
The American Tribune recently reported on comments from Nathan Wade’s testimony about his extravagant trips with Fani Willi. Many have alleged the trips have been prime exampIes of Willis abusing her position of power to misuse government funds.

A Fulton County Judge recently ruled that Willis and Wade would be forced to testify on these allegations of financial misconduct. Judge McAfee ruled, “I think the issues at point here are whether a relationship existed, whether that relationship was romantic or non-romantic in nature, when it formed, and whether it continues. And that’s only relevant because it’s in combination with the question of the existence and extent of any personal benefit conveyed as a result of their relationship.”
Judge McAfee continued in his ruling, “And so because I think its possibIe that the facts alleged by the defendant could result in disqualification, I think an evidentiary hearing must occur to establish the record on those core allegations.”
See footage of Fani Willis’ testimony below:

A Fulton County Judge recently ruled that Willis and Wade would be forced to testify on these allegations of financial misconduct. Judge McAfee ruled, “I think the issues at point here are whether a relationship existed, whether that relationship was romantic or non-romantic in nature, when it formed, and whether it continues. And that’s only relevant because it’s in combination with the question of the existence and extent of any personal benefit conveyed as a result of their relationship.”

Related Posts

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*